MySQL Group Replication vs MariaDB Galera Cluster: Choosing the Right High Availability Solution

When implementing high availability for MySQL and MariaDB databases, two prominent solutions stand out: MySQL Group Replication and MariaDB Galera Cluster. Both technologies provide synchronous multi-master replication capabilities, but they serve different use cases and have distinct architectural approaches. This comprehensive comparison will help you determine which solution best fits your specific requirements.

Understanding the Technologies

MySQL Group Replication

MySQL Group Replication is a native MySQL plugin that creates elastic, highly-available, fault-tolerant replication topologies ¹. It implements a more flexible and fault-tolerant replication mechanism with a pool of servers that are each involved in ensuring data consistency ². The technology operates in either single-primary mode with automatic primary election or multi-primary mode where all nodes can accept writes ¹.

MariaDB Galera Cluster

MariaDB Galera Cluster is a synchronous active-active database clustering technology that uses certification-based replication with group communication and transaction ordering to achieve synchronous replication ³. It ensures high availability and disaster recovery through synchronous multi-master replication, making it ideal for active-active setups with strong consistency and automatic failover ⁴.

Performance Characteristics and Limitations

MySQL Group Replication Performance

MySQL Group Replication achieves approximately 80% of the throughput of a standalone MySQL server when all write requests are directed to a single member in single-master mode ⁵. The technology is designed to create fault-tolerant systems with built-in failure detection and automated recovery ⁶.

Key Performance Limitations:

Maximum of 9 servers per replication group ⁷⁸
Default maximum transaction size of 150MB (143MB) ⁸
Performance degrades with large transactions due to network communication overhead ⁸

MariaDB Galera Cluster Performance

Galera Cluster performance is inherently limited by the slowest node in the cluster, and even a single-node Galera setup can have considerably lower performance compared to a standalone server ⁹. Users report that Galera can be 3x slower than standalone MariaDB with durable settings ¹⁰.

Key Performance Considerations:

Minimum recommended cluster size of 5 nodes (though 3 is technically sufficient) ¹¹
Performance bottlenecked by the slowest node ¹²
Large transactions can adversely affect node performance ⁹

Use Case Scenarios

MySQL Group Replication Use Cases

MySQL Group Replication excels in scenarios requiring:

1. Elastic Replication Environments

Environments requiring fluid replication infrastructure ¹³
Applications needing automatic failover with minimal downtime

2. Highly Available Shards

Implementing sharded architectures where each shard maps to a replication group ¹⁴¹⁵

3. Single-Primary High Availability

Applications that can work with one primary writer and multiple read replicas
Scenarios where write conflicts need to be minimized

MariaDB Galera Cluster Use Cases

MariaDB Galera Cluster is particularly well-suited for:

1. Active-Active Multi-Master Setups

Applications requiring true multi-master capabilities
Scenarios where all nodes need to accept writes simultaneously ⁴

2. High Availability with Strong Consistency

Critical applications needing continuous uptime
Systems requiring immediate consistency across all nodes ⁴

3. Geographic Distribution

Multi-datacenter deployments requiring synchronous replication
Disaster recovery scenarios with automatic failover

Technical Limitations and Constraints

MySQL Group Replication Limitations

Architectural Constraints:

Cannot be started after MySQL upgrade with –upgrade=MINIMAL option ⁸
Gap locks not considered in certification process ⁸
SERIALIZABLE isolation level not supported in multi-primary mode ⁸
Concurrent DDL and DML operations on same object across different servers not supported ⁸

Operational Limitations:

Multi-primary mode doesn’t support tables with cascading foreign key constraints ⁸
Global replication filters cannot be used ⁸
SELECT FOR UPDATE can cause deadlocks in multi-primary mode ⁸

MariaDB Galera Cluster Limitations

Storage Engine Restrictions:

Only InnoDB storage engine fully supported for replication ⁹
Experimental MyISAM support available but not recommended ⁹

Operational Constraints:

All tables should have primary keys ⁹
DELETE operations unsupported on tables without primary keys ⁹
XA transactions not supported ⁹
Query cache must be disabled in older versions ⁹

Performance and Scalability:

Large transactions can cause memory issues and performance degradation ⁹
Auto-increment values not sequential due to conflict avoidance mechanism ⁹
Windows not supported ⁹

Decision Matrix: When to Choose Which

Choose MySQL Group Replication When:

You need elastic scaling – Group Replication’s ability to add/remove nodes dynamically makes it ideal for cloud environments
Single-primary model fits your application – If your application can work with one writer and multiple readers
You’re already using MySQL – Native integration provides better compatibility and support
You need better performance – Generally offers better performance characteristics than Galera

Choose MariaDB Galera Cluster When:

True multi-master is required – All nodes need to accept writes simultaneously
You’re using MariaDB – Native integration with MariaDB provides optimal compatibility
Geographic distribution is critical – Better suited for multi-datacenter deployments
You need proven stability – Longer track record in production environments

Performance Optimization Strategies

MySQL Group Replication Optimization

Configure group_replication_member_expel_timeout for large transactions ⁸
Use group_replication_compression_threshold for message compression ⁸
Implement message fragmentation with group_replication_communication_max_message_size ⁸
Monitor performance using MySQL Performance Schema ¹⁶

MariaDB Galera Cluster Optimization

Ensure all nodes have similar performance characteristics to avoid bottlenecks ¹²
Implement proper load balancing to distribute read operations ¹⁷
Use appropriate wsrep_provider_options for network optimization
Monitor cluster status using Galera-specific status variables ¹⁸

Conclusion

Both MySQL Group Replication and MariaDB Galera Cluster offer robust high availability solutions, but they serve different architectural needs. MySQL Group Replication provides better performance and flexibility for applications that can work with single-primary setups, while MariaDB Galera Cluster excels in true multi-master scenarios requiring strong consistency across geographically distributed nodes.

The choice between these technologies should be based on your specific requirements for write patterns, geographic distribution, performance needs, and existing database infrastructure. Consider conducting proof-of-concept testing with your specific workload to validate performance characteristics before making a final decision.

Remember that both solutions require careful planning, proper monitoring, and understanding of their limitations to achieve optimal results in the production environment.

The WebScale Database Infrastructure Architecture, Engineering and Operations Company

Full-Stack Database Engineering & Cloud DBaaS Solutions for PostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB & More | Performance, Scalability, High Availability, Security & Analytics Experts

MySQL Group Replication vs MariaDB Galera Cluster

MySQL Group Replication vs MariaDB Galera Cluster: Choosing the Right High Availability Solution