Amazon Redshift Indexing for PostgreSQL DBAs: Performance Optimization Guide

As a PostgreSQL DBA transitioning to Amazon Redshift, understanding the fundamental differences in indexing approaches is crucial for optimal performance. Unlike PostgreSQL’s traditional B-tree and hash indexes, Redshift uses specialized columnar optimization techniques.

Key Difference: No Traditional Indexes in Redshift

Critical Point for PostgreSQL DBAs: Amazon Redshift does not support CREATE INDEX statements . This is a fundamental shift from PostgreSQL’s indexing model that requires a new optimization mindset.

Redshift’s Alternative to Traditional Indexing

1. Sort Keys (SORTKEY) – Your New Primary Index

Replace your PostgreSQL indexing strategy with sort keys:

-- PostgreSQL approach (won't work in Redshift)
-- CREATE INDEX idx_customer_date ON sales(customer_id, sale_date);

-- Redshift approach - Compound Sort Key
CREATE TABLE sales (
    customer_id INTEGER,
    sale_date DATE,
    amount DECIMAL(10,2)
)
COMPOUND SORTKEY (customer_id, sale_date);

-- Alternative - Interleaved Sort Key for equal column priority
CREATE TABLE user_events (
    user_id INTEGER,
    event_date DATE,
    event_type VARCHAR(50)
)
INTERLEAVED SORTKEY (user_id, event_date, event_type);

2. Distribution Keys (DISTKEY) – Optimize JOIN Performance

Control data distribution across cluster nodes:

-- Optimize for frequent JOINs
CREATE TABLE orders (
    order_id BIGINT,
    customer_id INTEGER DISTKEY,
    order_date DATE
)
SORTKEY (order_date);

3. Advanced Indexing: H3 Geospatial Support

For spatial data, Redshift offers H3 indexing capabilities :

-- New H3 functions available (2025)
SELECT H3_Center(h3_index) FROM spatial_data;
SELECT H3_Boundary(h3_index) FROM spatial_data;

Performance Optimization Strategies for PostgreSQL DBAs

Schema Design Best Practices

1. Choose Distribution Keys Wisely
   • Use columns frequently in JOINs (similar to foreign key optimization in PostgreSQL)
   • Ensure even data distribution
2. Sort Key Selection
   • Prioritize WHERE clause columns
   • Consider ORDER BY patterns
   • Use compound keys for hierarchical filtering
3. Column Compression Encoding
   • Let Redshift auto-select compression
   • Monitor compression ratios for storage optimization

Maintenance Operations (Different from PostgreSQL)

-- Redshift maintenance (replaces PostgreSQL REINDEX)
VACUUM table_name;
ANALYZE table_name;

-- Monitor table design effectiveness
SELECT * FROM SVV_TABLE_INFO WHERE table = 'your_table_name';

Performance Monitoring for DBAs

Query Performance Analysis

-- Monitor query performance (similar to pg_stat_statements)
SELECT query, elapsed, rows
FROM STL_QUERY_METRICS
WHERE query = your_query_id;

-- Check for optimization opportunities
SELECT * FROM STL_ALERT_EVENT_LOG
WHERE event_time >= CURRENT_DATE - 1;

Redshift Advisor Recommendations

Unlike PostgreSQL’s manual optimization, Redshift provides automated recommendations:

• Sort key suggestions
• Distribution key optimization
• Compression encoding improvements

Migration Considerations from PostgreSQL

What Changes:

• No B-tree indexes → Use sort keys
• No partial indexes → Use WHERE clauses efficiently
• No expression indexes → Pre-compute values in ETL
• No unique constraints → Handle in application logic

What Stays Similar:

• Query optimization principles
• Statistics importance (ANALYZE)
• Performance monitoring approaches

Best Practices Summary

1. Understand Your Workload: Analytical patterns differ from OLTP
2. Test Distribution Strategies: Even data distribution is critical
3. Monitor Performance: Use Redshift-specific tools
4. Regular Maintenance: VACUUM and ANALYZE operations
5. Leverage Redshift Advisor: Automated optimization suggestions

Conclusion

For PostgreSQL DBAs, mastering Redshift requires shifting from traditional indexing to columnar optimization strategies. Focus on sort keys, distribution keys, and compression rather than creating indexes. The performance gains come from aligning physical data layout with query patterns .

Key Takeaway: Redshift’s “indexing” is fundamentally about data organization and distribution, not traditional index structures. Embrace this paradigm shift for optimal performance in your data warehouse environment.

FAQs

1. What is the difference between Redshift SORTKEY and DISTKEY?
   Explains how SORTKEY and DISTKEY affect data distribution and query performance in Redshift.

2. Can PostgreSQL indexing techniques be directly applied to Amazon Redshift?
   Discusses similarities and differences in indexing between PostgreSQL and Redshift.

3. How does Amazon Redshift handle large-scale data distribution?
   Covers Redshift’s approach to distributing data for parallel query execution.

4. What are the best practices for optimizing query performance in Amazon Redshift?
   Summarizes key strategies including indexing, vacuuming, and analyzing tables.

5. How to monitor and analyze query performance in Amazon Redshift?
   Overview of tools and views available for performance monitoring in Redshift.

To Gain More Knowledge on the Subject, Read More:

1. PostgreSQL Performance Tuning Tips
   Learn advanced techniques to optimize PostgreSQL query execution and indexing.

2. Data Warehousing Strategies for DBAs
   Explore essential strategies for managing and optimizing data warehouses.

The Hidden Cost Drivers: How Suboptimal SQL Queries Inflate Your Amazon Redshift DBaaS TCO

Why do I have SQL statement plans in PostgreSQL that change for the worse?

How is page compression implemented in InnoDB?