PostgreSQL Checkpointing and Background Writing Process

PostgreSQL checkpointing is crucial in maintaining data integrity and ensuring consistent database performance. It works in tandem with background writing processes to manage disk I/O efficiently, reducing the risk of data loss in the event of a system crash. Since PostgreSQL uses Write-Ahead Logging (WAL) to maintain reliability, understanding how checkpointing works and optimizing its configuration is essential for minimising I/O spikes and improving recovery times.

Write-Ahead Logging (WAL)

PostgreSQL uses Write-Ahead Logging (WAL) as the foundation of its reliability system:

  • First, All changes are first written to WAL files before being applied to the actual data files
  • Consequently, this ensures data integrity even if the system crashes before changes are written to data files

Checkpointing Process

A checkpoint is a point in the transaction log sequence where all data files have been updated to reflect the information in the log. During a checkpoint:

  • The system flushes all dirty (modified) data pages in memory to disk.
  • It then writes a checkpoint record to the WAL, indicating completion.
  • Afterward, the system recycles or removes old WAL files.

Checkpoints occur:

  • Automatically based on time intervals (checkpoint_timeout)
  • When WAL reaches a certain size (max_wal_size)
  • When manually triggered via SQL command CHECKPOINT

Background Writer

The background writer process:

  • Gradually writes dirty shared buffers to disk outside of checkpoints
  • Helps distribute I/O load more evenly over time
  • Reduces the I/O spike during checkpoints

Key configuration parameters:

  • bgwriter_delay: Sleep time between rounds (default: 200ms)
  • bgwriter_lru_maxpages: Maximum pages written per round
  • bgwriter_lru_multiplier: Controls how aggressively to write based on recent activity

Impact on Application Development

For optimal database applications, consider:

1. Transaction Size Management

  • Large transactions generate more WAL data
  • Break large operations into smaller transactions when possible

2. Checkpoint Tuning

  • Too frequent: Excessive I/O overhead
  • Too infrequent: Longer recovery time after crashes and larger WAL storage requirements
  • Monitor pg_stat_bgwriter view to analyze checkpoint behavior

3. Memory Configuration

  • shared_buffers: Affects number of dirty pages that need flushing
  • Larger values can improve performance but increase checkpoint I/O spikes

4. Disk I/O Planning

  • Place WAL files on separate disks from data files when possible
  • Use fast storage for WAL files to improve transaction commit speed

5. Monitoring

  • Track checkpoint-related metrics in pg_stat_bgwriter
  • Watch for “checkpoint occurring too frequently” warnings in logs

By understanding and properly configuring these processes, you can achieve better performance, reduced I/O spikes, and improved recovery time in your PostgreSQL applications.


The Impact of Log File Synchronization on InnoDB Performance and Durability

 

Optimizing PostgreSQL Performance: Mastering Checkpointing Configuration

 

Mastering PostgreSQL Transaction Logs: Implementation Insights and Performance Tuning Strategies

About MinervaDB Corporation 101 Articles
Full-stack Database Infrastructure Architecture, Engineering and Operations Consultative Support(24*7) Provider for PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, MongoDB, ClickHouse, Trino, SQL Server, Cassandra, CockroachDB, Yugabyte, Couchbase, Redis, Valkey, NoSQL, NewSQL, Databricks, Amazon Resdhift, Amazon Aurora, CloudSQL, Snowflake and AzureSQL with core expertize in Performance, Scalability, High Availability, Database Reliability Engineering, Database Upgrades/Migration, and Data Security.